Ethics and malpractice instructions:
The majority of journals work under the direction of an Editorial Board, which offers knowledgeable recommendations on content, draws new authors, and promotes submissions.
The Editorial Board or (Editorial) Advisory Board is a group of subject-matter specialists for the journal. Editors on the board:
IWNW is an open-access journal.
At present, there are no publishing Charges.
The journal will be electronically available on the official website of the University of the Faculty of Archeology - Ain Shams University, and the Egyptian Knowledge Bank, and in case it stops issuing, its issues will be available on the website of the Faculty of Archeology - Ain Shams University - Egypt.
No marketing advertisements are allowed on the magazine's website, and therefore there is no financial revenue for the magazine.
Owned and funded by the Faculty of Archeology-Ain Shams University, and Ain Shams (University, Egypt.
It is ethically required of authors, editors, and reviewers to disclose any conflicts of interest when affiliation or official capacity between the parties results in conflict and one or more parties stand to gain financially or in terms of reputation, and the person with a conflict of interest is unable to manage the actual or anticipated negative effects of the conflict on the other parties in an equitable manner.
Information that has been altered with the intention of deceivingly promoting, diminishing, or in some other way misleading, including facts, citations, quotations, transcripts, archive documents, and audio and visual supporting resources. The editor should state that the matter will likely be forwarded to the organization or company where the research was conducted or any other pertinent organization or agency (such as a funding agency) unless the author offers a reasonable explanation that the editor accepts as reasonable in the communication to the corresponding author.
The publisher has a crucial role in protecting the integrity of the scientific record by supporting the enormous efforts made by journal editors and the frequent work performed by peer reviewers. The publisher is ultimately responsible for ensuring that best practices are followed in all of its publications, but they also play a supportive, investing, and nurturing role in the scholarly communication process. We also offer in-depth guidance on publication ethics requirements, especially for those who are just starting out as researchers.
Peer review helps the author improve the article through editorial contacts with the author. Reviewers are expected to treat authors and their work with respect and to follow appropriate reviewing etiquette. Any manuscripts sent for review are handled with confidentiality. A reviewer may not use any unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript for their own work. Peer review's privileged knowledge or ideas must be kept secret and not used for one's own benefit.
The authors should make sure that their writing is wholly unique, and if they have utilised someone else's ideas or words, they should make sure that they have quoted or cited them correctly and, if required, acquired permission. Only individuals who significantly contributed to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the reported study should be given the privilege of authorship. Co-authors should be named for everyone who contributed significantly.